Gran Vía Pro Educational Consulting, LLC training@granviapro.com
Welcome to ELAR 7-12 (331) Prep
Built on the official TEA competency framework and Gran Vía Pro proprietary training. Study all 4 selected-response domains, review 12 competencies, practice the constructed-response task, then simulate the real exam.
Questions90 Selected-Response + 1 CR
Time Limit5 Hours
FormatComputer-Adaptive
Competencies001–012
Exam Domains — Click to Study
Domain I: Reading Instruction and Assessment
25%
Foundations of reading instruction and assessment, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension for grades 7–12.
Competencies 001–003
Domain II: Text Comprehension and Analysis
17%
Text-based analysis of complex literary texts and of informational and argumentative texts.
Competencies 004–005
Domain III: Oral and Written Communication
25%
Composition, inquiry and research, and listening and speaking.
Competencies 006–008
Domain IV: Educating All Learners and Professional Practice
13%
Differentiation strategies, effective learning environments, and data-driven, formal/informal assessment practices.
Competencies 009–011
Official ELAR 7-12 (331) Exam Framework
Exam Name
English Language Arts and Reading 7–12
Exam Code
331
Time
5 hours
Questions
90 selected-response questions and 1 constructed-response question
Format
Computer-administered test (CAT)
Domains and Competencies
Domain
Title
% of Exam
Comps
I
Reading Instruction and Assessment
25%
001–003
II
Text Comprehension and Analysis
17%
004–005
III
Oral and Written Communication
25%
006–008
IV
Educating All Learners and Professional Practice
13%
009–011
V
Constructed Response
20%
012
Passing Score: 240 (scaled 100–300) · Domain V (20%) is scored entirely by the constructed-response task, not selected-response questions.
⭐ Gran Vía Pro — ELAR 331 Test-Taking Strategy
Domains I and III are your biggest targets — Reading Instruction/Assessment and Oral/Written Communication together make up half the exam.
Every competency ties back to the TEKS for ELAR (Grades 7–12) — Answer choices grounded in the standards, not generic best practice, are usually correct.
"Text-based analysis" is the exam's favorite phrase — Strong answers always point back to specific evidence in the passage, never a general impression.
Know your comprehension levels — literal, inferential, evaluative, and synthesis — the exam tests the boundary between these constantly.
The constructed response is 20% alone — Practice building a specific learning goal from a short excerpt, then assessing and differentiating toward it.
Domain IV isn't an afterthought — UDL, IEP/504 accommodations, and MTSS show up as frequently as content-area questions.
📖
Domain I: Reading Instruction and Assessment
25% of exam · Competencies 001–003
Key Theme: Reading instruction in grades 7–12 is standards-driven (grounded in the TEKS for ELAR), assessment-informed, and built on an integrated model of listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking — not isolated skill drills.
🎯 Domain I — Answer Choice Signal Words
Scan answer choices for these words when you're uncertain which is correct
✅ Good Words — Usually Correct
grounded in the TEKSevidence-basedbackground knowledgecomplex textsmultiple exposuresinterpret assessment data
❌ Bad Words — Usually Incorrect
memorizationworksheets over whole textsone-size-fits-allsingle exposureskip assessmentgrade level = language proficiency level
001
Foundations of Reading Instruction and Assessment
Reading instruction in grades 7–12 should reflect an integrated model of listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking — not treat these as separate strands.
Research- and evidence-based instruction is grounded in the TEKS for ELAR (Grades 7–12); assessment content should align to what has actually been taught so comprehension is measured fairly.
Reading proficiency in grades 7–12 depends heavily on background knowledge, daily time actually spent reading, and a curriculum built on complex texts and academic vocabulary — not memorization or worksheets.
Teachers must recognize the distinguishing characteristics of dyslexia and dysgraphia and apply evidence-based accommodations, referring students for formal evaluation when needed.
Second-language acquisition basics: general education teachers share responsibility for English learners' language development; linguistic accommodations must match a student's proficiency level — which is entirely separate from their grade level.
English learners acquire language best through multiple, incremental opportunities that build on strengths in their primary language, guided by ELPS and LPAC-designated supports.
Supporting ELs across content areas requires aligned language objectives and scaffolds — linguistically accommodated texts, sentence/paragraph frames, cognates, bilingual dictionaries, and graphic representations of vocabulary and concepts.
The Integrated ELAR Model
These five strands reinforce one another — instruction should weave them together, not isolate them
👂
Listening
⇄
🗣️
Speaking
⇄
📖
Reading
⇄
✍️
Writing
⇄
🧠
Thinking
A unit that only reads and quizzes — with no discussion or writing — is not an integrated model.
Dyslexia vs. Dysgraphia — Two Distinct Conditions
Both are neurologically based learning disabilities, but they affect different skills
Dyslexia — a reading disability
Affects word recognition and decoding: letter/number reversals, slow and labored sounding-out despite strong oral language, difficulty with spelling patterns, trouble with sequencing sounds and remembering details.
Dysgraphia — a writing disability
Affects handwriting and written expression: poor or inconsistent letter formation, irregular spacing/sizing, slow and effortful handwriting, and written output far below what the student can produce orally.
Teacher Response Ladder (applies to both)
1. Temporary accommodation (e.g., finger/ruler tracking for reading, or dictating/typing instead of handwriting) 2. Evidence-based instruction and progress monitoring 3. Formal referral for evaluation if characteristics persist
The Dyslexia Identification Process
Aligned to the Texas Dyslexia Handbook (TEC §38.003, 19 TAC §74.28)
1
Teacher/parent observation & data review — characteristics are noted through classroom performance, universal screening results, and existing RTI/MTSS intervention data.
2
Referral for a formal evaluation — parent or campus staff requests an evaluation; consent is obtained and a comprehensive individual evaluation begins.
3
Multidisciplinary team review — a team (including a dyslexia specialist) examines academic history, phonological processing, reading/spelling measures, and rules out other causes such as vision, hearing, or lack of appropriate instruction.
4
Identification & plan development — if identified, the team develops a 504 plan or IEP specifying accommodations and evidence-based, multisensory structured-language instruction (e.g., an Orton-Gillingham-based approach).
5
Ongoing progress monitoring — the team reviews data regularly to adjust instruction, accommodations, and services as the student progresses.
Common In-Class Accommodations for Dyslexia
1
Extended time on reading and writing tasks
2
Allow oral responses in place of written responses
3
Preferential seating near primary instruction
✏️ Section Check — Dyslexia & Dysgraphia
Proficiency Level ≠ Grade Level
A student can sit at any ELPS proficiency level in any grade 7–12 — the two are independent variables
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
↕ can occur in any grade ↕
7th
8th
Eng. I
Eng. II
Eng. III
Eng. IV
e.g., an Advanced-High senior (English IV) still needs proficiency-matched scaffolds — high grade level never implies full academic-English proficiency.
STARTING 2026–2027 — NEW 5-LEVEL ELPS (Grades 4–12 band)
Pre-Production
Beginning
Intermediate
High Intermediate
Advanced
Adopted by the SBOE September 2024 (19 TAC Ch. 120) — a new Pre-Production level is added below Beginning, and Advanced High collapses into Advanced as the top level. Grades 7–12 all fall under the single 4–12 grade band (a separate K–3 band also exists).
adapted textL1 native language supportssentence framescognatesbilingual dictionariesgraphic organizers
🔑 Beginning & Intermediate ELs Need L1 Accessibility Supports
Beginning and Intermediate English learners need L1 (native-language) linguistic accessibility supports for comprehensibility — without them, grade-level content is simply out of reach, regardless of how strong the content instruction itself is. As TEA's own TEKS Guide commentary puts it: comprehension of text requires additional scaffolds such as adapted text, translations, native language support, cognates, summaries, pictures, realia, glossaries, bilingual dictionaries, thesauri, and other modes of comprehensible input. These are not optional extras for these two proficiency levels — they are the difference between a lesson a student can access and one they cannot.
📜 This is state law, not a teaching preference
19 TAC §74.4(b)(2) and (c)(1) — the Texas Administrative Code section that codifies the ELPS — requires that school districts "provide instruction in the knowledge and skills of the foundation and enrichment curriculum in a manner that is linguistically accommodated (communicated, sequenced, and scaffolded) commensurate with the student's level of English language proficiency," and that this obligation applies to all content-area instruction delivered in English, not just the ESL/bilingual classroom. When an administrator or grade-level teacher pushes back on native-language supports as "unnecessary," "coddling," or a distraction from English immersion — often a raciolinguistic bias that treats a student's home language as a deficit rather than an asset — the response is that this isn't a discretionary style choice. It's a Texas-mandated legal obligation tied directly to the student's measured proficiency level.
Making the TEKS Comprehensible for Emergent Bilingual Learners
Gran Vía Pro's proprietary EL-differentiation framework, adapted from staff training materials
New ELPS/SIOP
Content & Language Objectives — Example
Content and language objectives.
TLW read about the water cycle, then write down or draw their reflections, discuss them within groups.
TLW = "The Learner Will." Color-coding the language function verbs (read/write/draw/discuss) makes the language objective — not just the content objective — explicit to students.
SHELTERED INSTRUCTION
🙋
TPR
Total Physical Response
→
🚫🗣️
Minimal Lecture
Avoid talk-only delivery
→
👥💬
Cooperative Learning
Structured group talk
→
✅
Check Understanding
Visual/verbal confirmation
Sheltered instruction makes grade-level content accessible by leaning on visuals, movement, and structured talk instead of lecture alone.
BEGINNER DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Rely heavily on visuals, realia, and gestures to convey meaning
Use TPR (Total Physical Response) to pair language with action
Allow responses in single words, gestures, or L1 while content develops
Pre-teach key vocabulary with pictures before the lesson begins
Provide native-language support — adapted/translated text, cognates, and bilingual dictionaries — since comprehension at this level depends on L1 accessibility
Assessment Strategies
TExES pattern: ask yes/no and either/or questions — the lowest linguistic-demand question types, since Beginners can respond by selecting rather than generating language. Assess using visuals, matching, pointing, or drawing rather than requiring written English responses · allow responses in L1 when possible · separate content mastery from English proficiency when scoring · provide extended time
INTERMEDIATE DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES
Linguistic Strategies
Provide sentence frames and starters · front-load key academic vocabulary · use visual supports (charts, images, realia) · continue native-language support (translations, cognates, summaries, bilingual dictionaries) for comprehensibility
Content Support
Allow non-verbal ways to show understanding · provide extended wait time · pair with a strategic partner
Assessment Strategies
TExES pattern: ask how? and why? questions — Intermediate learners can produce short explanatory language but aren't yet ready for extended, open-ended demands. Simplify the linguistic complexity of test questions without reducing content rigor · allow oral responses in place of extended writing · provide word banks or sentence starters on assessments · extend time as needed
FOR ADVANCED ENGLISH LEARNERS
Continued Language Development
Provide opportunities for extended academic discourse · encourage precise academic vocabulary in context · build on strengths in the primary language
Potential Challenges
Abstract and idiomatic language · multiple-meaning words · complex sentence structures and figurative language
Assessment Strategies
TExES pattern: ask open-ended, extended-response questions — summarizing, predicting, and making character inferences all demand the deep command of English that Advanced learners have developed. Assess with grade-level academic language, but allow brief clarification of unfamiliar vocabulary · score content mastery and language conventions separately · provide a glossary of key academic terms during testing
EB Instructional Practices
Every lesson for an emergent bilingual student should pair a content objective (what students will learn) with an explicit language objective (the language function and vocabulary students will practice while learning it) — and both should be stated in student-friendly terms and revisited at the close of the lesson.
🎯 LANGUAGE OBJECTIVE — made visible, taught explicitly, and checked for understanding
BICS and CALP and PLDs
Jim Cummins' framework: BICS (social/conversational language, ~1–2 years to develop) vs. CALP (academic language, ~5–7 years to develop)
Beginner
Spanish (L1)
English (L2)
BICS (conversation)
Full proficiency
Not yet developed
CALP (schooling)
Only CALP for processing information in Spanish
Not yet developed
A Beginner-level student can fully process academic content only in the primary language — grade-level English content must be sheltered until English CALP develops.
🧊 BICS vs. CALP — The Iceberg Model
One learner, one language — what you see on the surface is only a fraction of what lies beneath
BICS — Basic Interpersonal Communicative Skills
Informal Language
The visible tip — what a newcomer can do quickly
Develops in 1–2 years
Context-embedded, cognitively undemanding
Playground, hallway, lunch table
Does NOT equal academic readiness
CALP — Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency
Formal Language
The submerged mass — takes years to develop
Develops in 5–7+ years
Context-reduced, cognitively demanding
Textbooks, essays, STAAR, academic debate
The target of academic ESL instruction
TExES Trap: A parent says "My child speaks perfect English." That is BICS (Informal Language). BICS ≠ CALP. Social / informal fluency does not predict academic / formal language proficiency — and is never a reason to exit a student from ESL services prematurely.
Why it matters on the TExES: When a scenario describes a student who "speaks well" but underperforms academically, the correct answer always involves continued academic language support — never early exit or reduced services.
BICS/CALP Growth Across the Four Proficiency Levels
Beginning
L1 / L2
DOES NOT OUTPUT in BICS (social) English L2 DOES NOT PROCESS in CALP (academic) English L2 NEEDS beginner-level language support to process content in L1 (or a comparable home-language support) — adapted text, translations, cognates, pictures, and bilingual dictionaries SUPPLEMENT with strong sheltered instruction and L1 accessibility supports — adapted text, translations, native language support, cognates, summaries, pictures, realia, glossaries, bilingual dictionaries, thesauri, and other modes of comprehensible input
Intermediate
L1 / L2
DOES OUTPUT in BICS (social) English L2, with some errors DOES NOT YET PROCESS in CALP (academic) English L2 independently NEEDS moderate language support to process academic content, still benefiting from L1 support — native-language summaries, glossaries, and thesauri SUPPLEMENT with sheltered instruction and continued L1 accessibility supports — adapted text, translations, native language support, cognates, summaries, pictures, realia, glossaries, bilingual dictionaries, thesauri, and other modes of comprehensible input
Advanced
L1 / L2
DOES OUTPUT in BICS (social) English L2, comparable to peers DOES PROCESS in CALP (academic) English L2, with occasional support REQUIRES little to no L1 support for social communication; still benefits from academic language scaffolds SUPPLEMENT with targeted academic vocabulary and sentence-complexity support
Advanced High
L1 / L2
DOES OUTPUT in BICS (social) English L2, comparable to native-English-speaking peers DOES PROCESS in CALP (academic) English L2, with occasional support REQUIRES minimal support; approaching grade-level academic language proficiency SUPPLEMENT with occasional support for nuanced academic vocabulary and idiomatic language
✏️ Section Check — Supporting Comprehensibility of TEKS for Emergent Bilingual Learners
002
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary develops along a continuum described in the TEKS — students need frequent, repeated exposure to new words in meaningful contexts, not one-time introductions.
Vocabulary growth is shaped by familial, educational, socioeconomic, linguistic, and developmental factors, and by how much a student reads widely.
Three vocabulary tiers: Tier One (everyday words), Tier Two (general academic words used across content areas), and Tier Three (discipline-specific technical terms).
Knowledge of affixes and Greek/Latin roots helps students determine the meaning of academic words and of words/phrases borrowed from other languages.
Print and digital resources help clarify a word's meaning, syllabication, pronunciation, origin, part of speech, and multiple advanced meanings.
Context analysis distinguishes denotative, connotative, and figurative meanings and supports drawing conclusions about nuanced word choice.
Formal and informal vocabulary assessments should directly inform instructional planning, differentiation, and intervention decisions.
The 3 Tiers of Vocabulary
Tier Three — technical (e.g., "photosynthesis")
Tier Two — general academic, highest instructional priority (e.g., "analyze," "significant")
Tier One — everyday words (e.g., "happy," "run")
Widest base = words most students already know. Tier Two sits at the narrowest point of direct-instruction payoff — it appears across every content area.
Word-Learning Toolkit: Breaking Down "Transformation"
trans-
prefix: across/beyond
+
form
root: shape
+
-ation
suffix: process/result
=
a process of changing form
Denotative vs. Connotative vs. Figurative Meaning
Denotative
The literal dictionary definition
"childish" = behaving like a child
Connotative
The emotional or cultural association a word carries
A non-literal meaning built from context (metaphor, idiom)
"drowning in homework" ≠ literal water
✏️ Section Check — Competency 002
003
Reading Comprehension
Comprehension is an active meaning-construction process operating at literal, inferential, evaluative, and synthesis levels, deeply dependent on background knowledge.
Explicitly teach Tier Two and Tier Three words critical to a new concept or text — and don't overlook Tier One words students may not actually know.
Background knowledge and schema are essential for making inferences, connecting across texts, and learning through reading itself.
Text complexity has quantitative measures (word/sentence length) and qualitative features (text structure, author's purpose) that guide selecting increasingly difficult texts.
Comprehension of complex texts grows through focused rereading: text-dependent questions, annotation, deconstructing complex sentences, and rereading for different levels of meaning.
Metacognitive strategies — setting a purpose, questioning, predicting, visualizing, making connections, inferring, evaluating, synthesizing, monitoring — apply across literary and informational texts.
Independent, self-sustained reading grows through explicitly taught self-monitoring and comprehension-repair strategies, plus guidance in self-selecting appropriate texts.
Reading approach should shift with purpose: skimming for gist, scanning for specific information, or focused reading for deep understanding.
Responding to texts draws on listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking together — citing text evidence, paraphrasing, annotating, and defending or challenging an author's claims.
4 Levels of Reading Comprehension
1 · Literal
What the text explicitly states
2 · Inferential
Conclusions drawn from evidence + background knowledge
3 · Evaluative
Judging quality, credibility, or author's purpose
4 · Synthesis
Combining ideas across parts of a text, or across texts
Text Complexity: Quantitative vs. Qualitative
Quantitative
Measurable features: word length, sentence length, syllable count
Qualitative
Descriptive features: text structure, author's purpose, level of meaning
Key Theme: Every question in this domain asks for text-based analysis — how a specific literary or informational/argumentative text achieves its effect — not a general reaction to it.
🎯 Domain II — Answer Choice Signal Words
Scan answer choices for these words when you're uncertain which is correct
✅ Good Words — Usually Correct
text-based evidenceauthor's purposeorganizational structurerhetorical deviceanalyze the effect
❌ Bad Words — Usually Incorrect
personal opinion onlysummarize the plot onlyignore structureany interpretation is valid
004
Reading Literary Texts
Students analyze fiction, poetry, and drama across American, British, and world literature and time periods — genres include realistic/historical/science fiction, mystery, myth, and fantasy.
Poetry analysis covers sound, form, figurative language, meter, rhyme schemes and types (end, internal, slant), and other poetic conventions.
Word choice and imagery — controlling images, understatement, overstatement, irony, paradox — shape meaning across poetry, fiction, and drama.
Literary devices such as irony, oxymoron, satire, and allegory are analyzed for how an author uses them to achieve a specific purpose.
Theme develops through characterization and plot; students compare how similar themes surface across texts representing varied cultures.
Complex character analysis includes archetypes, historical/societal context, and how a character's motivations drive moral dilemmas that shape plot and theme.
Plot structure — linear and nonlinear, including foreshadowing, flashback, and subplots — and setting (historical, social, economic, sociological) both influence characterization and theme.
Diction and syntax contribute to a text's mood, voice, and tone; dramatic texts additionally use dialogue, staging, asides, soliloquies, and dramatic irony.
Comprehension of literary text spans literal, inferential, evaluative, appreciative, and critique levels — including whose voices and perspectives are present or absent.
Differentiation tools include story mapping, graphic representations, audio recordings, collaborative group work, and dialogic journals.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 004's core concepts, with worked examples
Genres Across Literature
Recognizing a text's genre sets up expectations for its structure, purpose, and conventions — and TExES scenario questions expect a teacher to name and teach those conventions explicitly, across American, British, and world literature and time periods.
Realistic fiction — events that could plausibly happen. Example: a novel about a teenager coping with her parents' divorce.
Historical fiction — a real past era with authentic period detail. Example: a story set during the Civil Rights Movement.
Science fiction — speculative science or technology. Example: a story set in a colony on Mars.
Mystery — a crime or puzzle to be solved. Example: a detective investigating a disappearance.
Myth — traditional stories explaining natural or cultural phenomena. Example: a Greek myth explaining why the seasons change.
Fantasy — invented worlds with magical or supernatural elements. Example: a story featuring dragons and wizards in an invented kingdom.
✏️ Section Check — Genres Across Literature
Poetry Analysis — Sound, Form & Meter
Poetry is analyzed for how its technical conventions — not just its subject matter — build meaning.
Form — a poem's structural pattern. Example: a sonnet's fixed 14 lines vs. free verse's open structure.
Meter — the rhythmic pattern of stressed/unstressed syllables. Example: iambic pentameter — 10 syllables per line, alternating unstressed-stressed.
Rhyme types — Example: "cat/hat" (end rhyme), "The rain in Spain" (internal rhyme), "soul/all" (slant rhyme).
✏️ Section Check — Poetry Analysis
Word Choice & Imagery
These craft choices shape meaning across poetry, fiction, and drama by controlling exactly how a reader perceives an idea or moment.
Controlling image — a single image or metaphor repeated throughout a text to reinforce a central idea. Example: a recurring river image representing the passage of time.
Understatement — deliberately presenting something as less significant than it is. Example: calling a hurricane "a bit windy."
Overstatement (hyperbole) — exaggerating for effect. Example: "I've told you a million times."
Irony — a gap between expectation and reality. Example: a fire station burning down (situational irony).
Paradox — a statement that seems contradictory but reveals a deeper truth. Example: "The more you give away, the more you have."
✏️ Section Check — Word Choice & Imagery
Literary Devices & Author's Purpose
Authors choose devices deliberately — the TExES tests whether a teacher can name why a device was used, not just identify that it's present.
Irony — creates tension, humor, or critique. Example: a character confidently predicting success right before failing.
Satire — uses humor and exaggeration to critique society or individuals. Example: a story mocking political corruption through absurdly exaggerated officials.
Allegory — characters/events symbolically represent broader ideas. Example: an animal fable where each animal stands in for a real political figure or ideology.
Theme is rarely stated directly — it emerges through how characters act, change, and resolve conflict as the plot unfolds. Example: a theme about "the cost of ambition" might emerge through a character whose rise to power is driven by choices that ultimately cause their downfall.
Cross-cultural comparison: the same theme can surface differently across cultures — a coming-of-age theme might appear in a West African novel through a traditional rite of passage, and in an American novel through a first job or a move away from home. Comparing these surfaces both the shared human theme and the culturally specific detail that expresses it.
✏️ Section Check — Theme, Characterization & Plot
Complex Character Analysis
Archetypes — universal character types recognizable across cultures. Example: the hero, the mentor, the trickster, the outcast.
Historical/societal context — a character's choices make sense in light of their era's norms. Example: a character's limited options due to the gender norms of a historical period.
Motivations → moral dilemmas — a character's internal wants create difficult choices that drive plot and reveal theme. Example: a character torn between loyalty to family and personal ambition.
✏️ Section Check — Complex Character Analysis
Plot Structure & Setting
Teachers often struggle less with plot structure itself than with cleanly telling apart the four setting types — they overlap in real texts, but TExES scenario questions expect you to name the specific one driving the analysis.
Plot Structure
Linear — chronological order. Example: a story told in the exact order the day's events happened.
Foreshadowing — hints at what's to come. Example: a character noticing dark storm clouds moments before tragedy strikes.
Flashback — interrupts the present to show an earlier event. Example: a veteran's mind returning to a battle scene mid-conversation.
Subplot — a secondary storyline that supports or contrasts the main plot. Example: a friend's side romance unfolding while the protagonist chases a career goal.
Setting — 4 Types Teachers Confuse Most
Historical — the specific time period, with its events and norms. Example: wartime raises the stakes of every choice a character makes.
Social — the immediate community and relationships. Example: a tight-knit small town where everyone knows everyone's business.
Economic — the financial conditions surrounding characters. Example: a family's poverty forces a character into a difficult moral choice.
Sociological — broader societal structures, institutions, and laws. Example: segregation laws restricting where a character can go.
✏️ Section Check — Plot Structure & Setting
Diction, Syntax & Dramatic Craft
Diction (word choice) and syntax (sentence structure) work together to build a text's mood, voice, and tone — often without a reader consciously noticing how.
Diction — word choice and connotation. Example: calling a house "dilapidated" vs. "cozy" creates two very different moods for the same setting.
Syntax — sentence length and structure. Example: short, choppy sentences during a chase scene build urgency; long, flowing sentences in a reflective scene build calm.
Teacher mix-up to watch for: an aside is brief and spoken in front of other characters (who don't hear it) — a soliloquy is longer and delivered when the character is completely alone onstage.
Aside — a brief remark to the audience, unheard by others onstage. Example: a character mutters their true opinion of a plan while nodding along to it.
Soliloquy — an extended speech alone onstage revealing inner thought. Example: a character weighing a life-or-death decision aloud with no one else present.
Staging — stage directions describing setting, movement, and action. Example: a direction noting a character should "pace anxiously by the window."
Dramatic irony — the audience knows something a character doesn't. Example: the audience watches a villain lie to a trusting protagonist.
On Stage: Aside vs. Soliloquy
THE STAGE — ASIDE
🙂 🗣️💬 🙂
other characters present, don't hear it
👀 audience hears
THE STAGE — SOLILOQUY
🧍💭
character is completely alone onstage
👀 audience hears
Both let the audience in on a character's true thoughts — the difference is brevity and whether anyone else is present to (not) hear it.
These five levels are easy to name but hard to tell apart in practice — evaluative is about judging the author's craft, appreciative is a personal emotional reaction, and critique specifically asks whose voice is (or isn't) telling the story. Teachers most often confuse those last three.
1 · Literal — what the text explicitly states. Example: identifying that a character moved to a new city, because the text says so directly.
2 · Inferential — conclusions drawn from evidence plus background knowledge. Example: inferring a character feels lonely from details like eating alone and avoiding calls, even though "lonely" is never stated.
3 · Evaluative — judging the quality, credibility, or effectiveness of the author's craft. Example: deciding whether a plot twist was well set up by earlier foreshadowing or felt unearned.
4 · Appreciative — a personal emotional or aesthetic response to the text. Example: a reader feeling moved by a character's sacrifice and reflecting on why the language affected them.
5 · Critique — examining whose voices and perspectives are centered, marginalized, or absent. Example: noticing a war novel is told entirely from soldiers' viewpoints, with civilian or enemy perspectives left out.
✏️ Section Check — The 5 Comprehension Levels
Differentiation Tools for Literary Text
Story mapping — a graphic organizer charting character, setting, conflict, and resolution. Use it for: students who lose track of complex, nonlinear plots.
Graphic representations — visual organizers like Venn diagrams or timelines. Use it for: making relationships or event sequences visible at a glance.
Audio recordings — students listen to a fluent read-aloud while following along. Use it for: struggling readers or English learners accessing complex vocabulary and syntax.
Collaborative group work — structured discussion, e.g. literature circles. Use it for: building understanding by hearing multiple interpretations of the same text.
Dialogic journals — an ongoing written back-and-forth between student and teacher (or peers) responding to a text. Use it for: building sustained written reflection and deeper comprehension over time.
🗺️
Story Mapping
📊
Graphic Reps
🎧
Audio Recordings
👥
Group Work
📓
Dialogic Journals
✏️ Section Check — Differentiation Tools
Literary Genres & Devices at a Glance
📖
Fiction
Realistic, historical, science fiction, mystery, myth, fantasy
Sound — alliteration, assonance, onomatopoeia, meter
Form — stanza structure, line breaks, fixed forms
Figurative Language — metaphor, simile, personification, symbolism
Word Choice & Imagery — controlling images, understatement, overstatement, paradox
Rhyme Types
End rhyming words at line ends
Internal rhyme within a single line
Slant near-rhyme, similar but not exact sounds
5 Levels of Literary Comprehension
1 · Literal
What the text explicitly states
2 · Inferential
Conclusions drawn from evidence in the text
3 · Evaluative
Judging quality, credibility, and author's craft
4 · Appreciative
Emotional and aesthetic response to the text
5 · Critique
Evaluating whose voices/perspectives are present or absent
Linear vs. Nonlinear Plot Timeline
Linear
1
2
3
4
5
events told in the order they happen
Nonlinear
1
2
🔮
3
⏪flashback
1
4
5
🔮 = foreshadowing hint at event 2 · ⏪ = flashback interrupts the sequence to revisit event 1
A subplot runs as its own parallel line alongside the main plot — a separate storyline that supports or contrasts it.
4 Setting Types Shaping a Character
Historical
Social
🎭
Economic
Sociological
A single character's choices are simultaneously shaped by all four — a teacher's job is naming which one is driving a specific analysis question.
✏️ Section Check — Competency 004
005
Reading Informational and Argumentative Texts
Informational texts are analyzed for structural elements: a clear thesis, relevant supporting evidence, examples, commentary, summary, and conclusion.
Author's purpose, audience, and message drive both informational and argumentative texts — and the organizational design of a text should match its purpose.
Argumentative texts are built on arguable claims, appeals, varied evidence, treatment of counterarguments (concessions, rebuttals), an identifiable audience, and a convincing conclusion.
Author's craft includes word choice and rhetorical devices — appeals, antithesis, parallelism, shifts — as well as the effects of logical fallacies.
Print and graphic features, and multimodal/digital formats, are analyzed for how they help an author achieve a specific purpose.
Comprehension spans literal, inferential, evaluative, and synthesis levels, including critical thinking about a text's credibility and which perspectives are present or absent.
Differentiation strategies include building background knowledge, tiered assignments, graphic organizers, and targeted mini-lessons.
Formal and informal assessment of nonliterary text skills — including visual images and messages — should directly inform instructional adjustments.
Anatomy of an Informational Text
Thesis
→
Evidence
→
Examples
→
Commentary
→
Summary
→
Conclusion
Organizational design should always match the author's purpose — cause/effect, compare/contrast, problem/solution, description, or sequence.
Anatomy of an Argument
Claim an arguable position
Evidence varied, credible support
3 Rhetorical Appeals
Ethos credibility
Pathos emotion
Logos logic
Counterargument concessions & rebuttals
Conclusion convincing close for a defined audience
Rhetorical Devices vs. Logical Fallacies
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis · parallelism · rhetorical shifts · appeals — used deliberately to strengthen an argument's persuasive effect
Logical Fallacies
Errors in reasoning (ad hominem, hasty generalization, circular reasoning, false dilemma) that weaken an argument's validity
4 Levels of Informational Comprehension
1 · Literal
What the text explicitly states
2 · Inferential
Conclusions drawn from evidence + purpose
3 · Evaluative
Judging credibility and whose perspectives are present/absent
4 · Synthesis
Combining ideas across texts or text features
✏️ Section Check — Competency 005
🖊️
Domain III: Oral and Written Communication
25% of exam · Competencies 006–008
Key Theme: Composition, research, and speaking are all taught as processes — generate, structure, revise, and self-assess — matched to a specific purpose and audience.
🎯 Domain III — Answer Choice Signal Words
Scan answer choices for these words when you're uncertain which is correct
✅ Good Words — Usually Correct
purpose and audiencerevise and editreliable, credible sourcecite ethicallyadjust to audience
❌ Bad Words — Usually Incorrect
skip revisionany source is finecopy without citingone-size-fits-all delivery
006
Composition
Students select the most appropriate genre — literary (narrative, fiction), informational, argumentative, literary analysis, or rhetorical analysis — for a given topic, purpose, and audience.
Idea generation strategies include brainstorming, journaling, discussing, and background reading before drafting begins.
Strong writing uses a purposeful text structure: an introduction, transitions, coherence within and across paragraphs, and a conclusion, built around a clear controlling idea or thesis.
Revision targets organization, coherence, clarity, style, word choice, and sentence variety; editing targets standard English conventions like pronoun-antecedent agreement, verb tense, voice, spelling, and punctuation.
Technology should be integrated at every stage of the writing process, and self-assessment (for clarity, comprehensiveness, interest) is an explicitly modeled skill.
Differentiated writing instruction includes student choice of topics, graphic organizers during drafting, and mini-lessons on targeted skills.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 006's core concepts, with worked examples
Choosing the Right Genre
📖
Literary Narrative
📰
Informational
💬
Argumentative
🔍
Literary Analysis
🎤
Rhetorical Analysis
Genre choice always follows purpose and audience. Example: a student wanting to convince the school board to fund a new club writes argumentative; a student examining how symbolism builds theme in a novel writes literary analysis.
The 5 Genres, Explained
Each genre answers a different question for a different audience — naming which one fits a scenario is what the TExES actually tests.
📖Literary Narrative — tells a personal or fictional story with a clear sequence of events, characters, and a point. Example: a personal essay about overcoming a challenge, told in first person with vivid sensory detail.
📰Informational — explains a topic using facts, examples, and a clear structure, without arguing a position. Example: an essay explaining how vaccines train the immune system.
💬Argumentative — takes and defends a position using claims, evidence, and treatment of counterarguments. Example: an essay arguing for a later school start time, citing sleep research and answering scheduling objections.
🔍Literary Analysis — examines how a literary work's own elements (symbolism, character, structure) build meaning. Example: an essay analyzing how color imagery reflects a protagonist's emotional arc.
🎤Rhetorical Analysis — examines HOW a real speaker or writer uses strategies (appeals, diction, structure) to affect an audience. Example: an essay analyzing how a political speech uses pathos and repetition to unify an audience after a crisis.
Literary Analysis vs. Rhetorical Analysis
The two genres teachers confuse most — both say "analyze," but they analyze different things.
🔍 Literary Analysis Analyzes a literary text — fiction, poetry, drama — for how its craft elements build theme. Asks: "What does this novel's symbolism reveal about its theme?"
🎤 Rhetorical Analysis Analyzes a real communicator's persuasive strategy in a speech, essay, or ad. Asks: "How does this speaker's word choice move this specific audience?"
The Writing Process
Generate Ideas
→
Draft
→
Revise
→
Edit
→
Publish
Idea generation happens through brainstorming, journaling, discussing, and background reading — before drafting begins.
Revision vs. Editing
The #1 mix-up on this competency — the two are tested constantly, and are NOT interchangeable.
Revision — the BIG stuff
Organization, coherence, clarity, style, word choice, sentence variety. Example: reordering paragraphs so the argument builds logically, or replacing vague words with precise ones.
Editing — the SMALL stuff
Standard English conventions: pronoun-antecedent agreement, verb tense, voice, spelling, punctuation. Example: fixing a comma splice or correcting subject-verb agreement.
Anatomy of Purposeful Text Structure
Introduction
→
Transitions
→
Coherent Body
→
Conclusion
The whole structure is built around one clear controlling idea or thesis — every paragraph should visibly serve it.
✏️ Section Check — Competency 006
007
Inquiry and Research
Research begins with developing focused questions, then critiquing and revising the research plan as the major question evolves.
Students distinguish primary from secondary sources and evaluate every source for reliability, credibility, and accuracy.
Recognizing logical fallacies — ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, circular reasoning, false dilemmas — is core to evaluating sources and arguments.
Synthesizing information from multiple sources, then paraphrasing, quoting, and citing ethically, is what separates research from plagiarism.
An appropriate mode of delivery (written, oral, multimodal) is chosen to present research results in a well-organized, ethical manner.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 007's core concepts, with worked examples
The Research Process
Question
→
Plan
→
Search
→
Evaluate
→
Synthesize
→
Cite & Deliver
The research plan is never fixed — students critique and revise the guiding question as their search turns up new information.
Primary vs. Secondary Sources
Primary source — a firsthand account or original document from the time of the event. Example: a soldier's diary entry written during a war.
Secondary source — analyzes, interprets, or summarizes primary sources. Example: a historian's book written decades later analyzing that war.
Evaluating a Source: 3 Checks
Reliability Is it consistent with other credible sources?
Credibility Does the author have relevant expertise?
Accuracy Are claims supported by verifiable evidence?
Also watch for: logical fallacies (ad hominem, hasty generalization, circular reasoning, false dilemma) weakening an argument's validity, even in an otherwise credible-looking source.
Synthesize, Don't Plagiarize
Ethical research combines ideas from multiple sources into new understanding, while always crediting where each idea came from.
Paraphrase — restate in your own words. Still needs a citation.
Quote — use the source's exact words, in quotation marks. Needs a citation.
Synthesize — combine multiple sources into one coherent new idea. Every source used still needs credit.
Modes of Delivery
📝
Written
🎤
Oral
🖥️
Multimodal
✏️ Section Check — Competency 007
008
Listening and Speaking
Active listening means responding appropriately and adjusting communication to a specific audience and purpose — including following and giving complex oral instructions.
Respectful discourse involves evaluating a speaker's clarity and coherence and critiquing how their diction and syntax shape impact.
Effective delivery uses eye contact, appropriate rate, volume, enunciation, pauses, and purposeful gestures within the social context.
Formal presentations need a clear thesis, a logical progression of valid evidence from reliable sources, and language matched to audience, purpose, and occasion.
Collaborative discussions require asking insightful questions, building on others' ideas, working toward consensus, and tolerating ambiguity in decision making.
Sound spoken arguments follow a structure — introduction, transitions, body, conclusion — and use the art of persuasion and rhetorical devices deliberately.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 008's core concepts, with worked examples
Elements of Effective Delivery
👀
Eye Contact
⏱️
Rate
🔊
Volume
🗣️
Enunciation
⏸️
Pauses
👋
Gestures
All six are always chosen relative to the social context — a formal debate calls for a different pace and gesture range than an informal small-group discussion.
Anatomy of a Formal Presentation
Clear Thesis
→
Valid Evidence
→
Audience-Matched Language
→
Conclusion
Active Listening & Adjusting Communication
Active listening isn't passive — it means responding appropriately and adapting how you communicate to a specific audience and purpose. Example: a student giving directions to a peer rephrases and slows down after noticing confused facial expressions, rather than repeating the same instruction louder.
Collaborative Discussion Skills
Asking insightful questions — pushing the group's thinking deeper, not just seeking clarification.
Building on others' ideas — explicitly referencing and extending a peer's point.
Working toward consensus — moving a group discussion toward a shared conclusion.
Tolerating ambiguity — staying productive in discussion even without an immediate, clear-cut answer.
The Collaborative Discussion Cycle
🙋
Asking Insightful Questions
🔗
Building on Others' Ideas
💬
🤝
Working Toward Consensus
🌊
Tolerating Ambiguity
These four skills don't happen in a fixed order — a productive discussion cycles through all of them continuously, often returning to a question even after the group has started building toward consensus.
✏️ Section Check — Competency 008
🌐
Domain IV: Educating All Learners and Professional Practice
13% of exam · Competencies 009–011
Key Theme: Effective teachers differentiate proactively (UDL), build environments where every learner can take risks, and use assessment data — not intuition — to decide what happens next.
🎯 Domain IV — Answer Choice Signal Words
Scan answer choices for these words when you're uncertain which is correct
✅ Good Words — Usually Correct
multiple data pointscollaborate with professionalsflexible, proactive designhigh expectations for all
❌ Bad Words — Usually Incorrect
single test scoreexclude the studentretrofit after the factignore the IEP team
009
Differentiation Strategies in Planning and Practice
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) guidelines build in flexibility from the start to maximize learning opportunities for every student — not as an add-on after planning is done.
Instruction should build on students' individual interests, primary language, experiences, and prior knowledge, fostering active participation in 1:1, small-group, and large-group settings.
Teachers adjust and scaffold instruction, activities, and assessment in response to ongoing feedback from students.
Selecting appropriate accommodations and modifications for students with 504 plans or IEPs requires collaborating with other professionals — not acting alone.
Teachers must know the disability categories under IDEA and understand Child Find obligations for students with unique learning differences.
Professional conduct is guided by the Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators, alongside campus-specific policies.
Communicating regularly and constructively with parents/guardians about student progress is part of partnering toward shared achievement goals.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 009's core concepts, with worked examples
UDL: Proactive, Not Retrofit
The #1 UDL mix-up: building flexibility in from day one vs. bolting on accommodations after a lesson fails.
❌ Retrofit Teach one way to everyone, then scramble to accommodate the students who struggled.
✅ Proactive UDL Design multiple ways in from the start, so most students never need a later fix.
The 3 UDL Principles
👁️
Representation
Multiple ways to take in information
✍️
Action & Expression
Multiple ways to show what they know
🔥
Engagement
Multiple ways to spark motivation
504 Plan vs. IEP
Both require an accommodations team — neither is a solo teacher decision.
504 Plan Provides accommodations for equal access — no specialized instruction. Example: extended test time for a student with ADHD.
IEP A legally binding plan under IDEA with specialized instruction and services. Example: a reading-intervention goal with weekly progress monitoring.
IDEA & Child Find
IDEA establishes the disability categories that qualify a student for special education services. Child Find is the legal obligation for schools to actively identify and evaluate students who may need those services — a teacher who notices signs of a possible disability must act on Child Find, not wait for a parent to request an evaluation.
Grouping Structures for Active Participation
🧑
1:1
👥
Small Group
👨👩👧👦
Large Group
✏️ Section Check — Competency 009
010
Strategies to Support Effective Learning Environments
A safe, positive, and supportive learning environment underlies engagement and exploration for every student.
Primary languages and multilingualism are assets — a supportive environment for English learners promotes their overall development, not just their English acquisition.
Language plays a role in all learning; instruction must be accommodated so both language and content are accessible across every content area.
Effective teachers work collaboratively with parents, stakeholders, related-service providers, and community partners to support all students, including ELs and students in bilingual/ESL programs.
Collaboration also extends to implementing an IEP and other instructional accommodations alongside related-service providers.
Behavior management systems and a classroom culture of high expectations help students take responsibility for their own learning.
Maximizing instructional time — including how transitions are managed — is itself an evidence-based practice.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 010's core concepts, with worked examples
Multilingualism Is an Asset, Not a Deficit
A supportive environment for English learners promotes their overall development — not just their English acquisition. Example: a teacher who allows a student to think through a complex idea in their primary language before presenting it in English is honoring the whole student, not lowering expectations.
The Collaboration Circle
Parents
Stakeholders
🎓
Related-Service Providers
Community Partners
Every student — including ELs and students in bilingual/ESL programs — benefits when the teacher actively coordinates across all four groups, rather than working in isolation.
Behavior, High Expectations & Instructional Time
Behavior management + high expectations — a predictable system paired with a culture that expects every student to succeed builds student ownership of their own learning.
Maximizing instructional time — tightly managed transitions between activities are themselves an evidence-based practice, not just good classroom management.
✏️ Section Check — Competency 010
011
Data-Driven Practice and Formal/Informal Assessment
Different assessment types serve different purposes: developmental screenings, formative and summative assessments, observations, portfolios, state-mandated tests, and curriculum-based measures each answer a different question.
Assessments should be selected and developed to align directly with instructional objectives, using results to inform instruction and measure progress.
Accommodations may be necessary to ensure an assessment accurately measures a student's progress toward grade-level TEKS — not just their general ability.
Teachers must recognize legal and ethical issues in assessment, including confidentiality and responsible assessment practices.
MTSS is built on multiple data points used to differentiate tiered instruction for all students, not a single flagged score.
Interpreting formal and informal assessment data — including multiple measures — should directly inform decisions, goal-setting, and ongoing adjustments to instruction.
Systematic observation and documentation (anecdotal notes, checklists, data collection) provide ongoing insight into a student's development, strengths, and needs.
📖 Concepts, Context & Examples
A closer look at Competency 011's core concepts, with worked examples
Types of Assessment
Each type answers a different question — knowing which one to reach for is what the TExES actually tests.
🔎Developmental Screenings
A brief, universal check given to every student early on to quickly flag who may need closer attention. Example: a beginning-of-year reading screener identifying students below benchmark.
✅Formative
Ongoing, informal checks during instruction, used to adjust teaching in real time. Example: an exit ticket or a quick thumbs-up/thumbs-down check mid-lesson.
📋Summative
Given after instruction to evaluate overall mastery of what was taught. Example: a unit test or a final exam.
👁️Observations
Systematic watching and noting of a student's behavior or performance during authentic classroom tasks. Example: recording a student's reading fluency during independent reading time.
🗂️Portfolios
A collection of student work samples gathered over time to show growth. Example: a folder of writing samples from August through May showing clear improvement.
📝State-Mandated Tests
Standardized tests required by the state to measure mastery of grade-level standards. Example: STAAR.
📐Curriculum-Based Measures
Brief, frequent, standardized probes tied directly to what's being taught, used to monitor progress on one specific skill over time. Example: a weekly one-minute oral reading fluency probe.
🎯 The principle that applies to ALL seven types: alignment to objectives
Whichever type is used, it must be selected and developed to align directly with the instructional objective being measured — and accommodations may be needed so the result reflects a student's progress toward grade-level TEKS, not just their general ability.
MTSS: A Pyramid of Tiered Support
Built on multiple data points — never a single flagged score.
Tier 3 — Intensive, Individualized
Tier 2 — Targeted, Small-Group
Tier 1 — Core Instruction for All Students
From Data to Decision
Collect Data
→
Interpret
→
Set Goals
→
Adjust Instruction
Legal and ethical practice requires confidentiality at every step — data is used to serve the student, never shared or displayed carelessly.
Documentation Methods
Systematic, ongoing records — not one-time snapshots — of a student's development, strengths, and needs.
📓Anecdotal Notes
Brief, dated, factual written observations of a specific moment — what the student said or did, without judgment or interpretation added in. Example: "10/14 — Retold the story's events in order without prompting, but could not identify the theme when asked directly."
☑️Checklists
A predefined list of skills or behaviors marked present, absent, or in progress — fast to complete and easy to compare across time or across students. Example: a phonics-skills checklist marking which letter-sound patterns a student has mastered.
📊Data Collection
Ongoing, quantifiable tracking of a specific measure over time — the raw numbers that reveal a trend a single observation can't show. Example: a running graph of weekly oral-reading-fluency scores across a grading period.
Together, these three methods build a fuller picture of a student's progress than any single formal test can — and directly inform instructional decisions, goal-setting, and MTSS tier placement.
✏️ Section Check — Competency 011
🖊️
Constructed-Response Practice
Domain V · 20% of your score · 1 written response, ~400–600 words
On the real exam you'll be given a short grade-level literary or informational excerpt and an academic standard, then asked to describe principles and strategies for building standards-based, data-driven instruction toward a specific learning goal. Practice with the original scenario below, then compare your response to the rubric and sample approach.
📚 CRQ Study Guide
Study Supports, Rubric & Reference Guide — English Language Arts and Reading 7–12 (331)
Section 1 — CRQ Scoring Rubric
The ELAR 331 constructed response is scored on a 4-point scale across three performance characteristics: Completion, Application of Content, and Support. Use this rubric to self-assess practice responses.
Score
Completion
Application of Content
Support
4
Fully addresses all five tasks — connects prior knowledge, identifies a need, describes an instructional strategy, describes an assessment method, and explains data use.
Accurate, highly effective application of ELAR content and pedagogy. Demonstrates thorough understanding of standards-based, data-driven instruction.
Strong, relevant evidence from all three exhibits. Specific examples with well-reasoned explanations.
3
Addresses most or all tasks, though one part may be less fully developed.
Generally accurate, effective application. Demonstrates general understanding of ELAR pedagogy and the TEKS.
Sufficient evidence from the exhibits. Some examples and generally sound explanations.
2
Addresses at least some tasks. May miss one part entirely or provide incomplete strategies.
Partially accurate, limited application. May contain inaccuracies or limited reference to the TEKS.
Limited evidence. Examples or explanations, when provided, are only partially appropriate.
1
Addresses few, if any, tasks. Significant omissions across all components.
Largely inaccurate, ineffective application. Demonstrates little understanding of ELAR pedagogy.
Little to no evidence. Examples or explanations, if provided, are weak or inappropriate.
The 5 Required Tasks
Your response must address all five tasks below, citing the exhibits. Missing any task drops you below a Score 4.
Connect prior knowledge: describe one strategy to help the student connect prior knowledge and real-world experience to the excerpt's content and context.
Identify the need: describe one area of academic need the student demonstrates, tied to a specific ELAR skill or learning objective — cited from the exhibits.
Instructional strategy: describe one developmentally appropriate strategy to address that need, and explain why you'd use it.
Assessment method: describe one developmentally appropriate method to monitor the student's progress toward the objective.
Use the data: explain how you'd use data from that assessment to measure progress and plan future instruction.
Section 2 — Response Completion Checklist
Component
Included?
1. Describe a strategy connecting prior knowledge/real-world experience to the excerpt
☐
2. Identify ONE academic need tied to a specific ELAR skill or learning objective
☐
3. Cite specific evidence for that need from Exhibit 2 (and Exhibit 3, if relevant)
☐
4. Describe ONE developmentally appropriate instructional strategy for the need
☐
5. Explain WHY that strategy is appropriate for this student and this need
☐
6. Describe ONE developmentally appropriate assessment method
☐
7. Explain how assessment data would measure progress and shape future instruction
☐
8. Reference the given TEKS standard explicitly, not just generally
☐
9. Reference evidence from all three exhibits somewhere in the response
☐
10. Response is approximately 400–600 words
☐
Response Structure Template: Paragraph 1 — prior-knowledge connection strategy. Paragraph 2 — academic need, cited from the exhibits. Paragraph 3 — instructional strategy + rationale. Paragraph 4 — assessment method. Paragraph 5 — how the data informs next steps.
Section 3 — Identifying an Academic Need: Problems & Strategies
Match the need you observe in the student's work sample and discussion transcript to an evidence-based instructional strategy. Always cite a pattern from the exhibits, not an isolated moment.
Need
What to Look For
Instructional Strategy
Why It Works
Vague, unsupported inferences
Inferences stated without pointing to specific text; misses obvious textual clues
Two-column "Detail → Inference" graphic organizer
Makes the evidence-to-inference link explicit and visible
Limited vocabulary knowledge
Misuses or avoids key terms from the excerpt; asks for word meanings during discussion
Pre-teaching Tier 2 words with student-friendly definitions and context sentences
Removes word-level barriers before deeper analysis is possible
Difficulty analyzing figurative language/craft
Identifies a device by name but can't explain its effect on tone or meaning
Device → literal meaning → effect on tone three-column chart
Scaffolds the move from naming a device to analyzing its purpose
Weak text-structure awareness
Response is disorganized; misses cause/effect or compare/contrast signal words
Text-structure graphic organizer matched to the passage's structure
Makes the text's organization visible and easier to follow and reproduce
Difficulty distinguishing evidence from opinion
Blends personal reaction with textual claims; can't separate the two on request
Sentence frames separating "The text says..." from "I think..."
Builds the habit of citing text before interpreting it
Limited engagement with author's purpose
Summarizes content but doesn't address why the author made a specific choice
Guided "why here, why this word" annotation during rereading
Directs attention specifically to authorial decision-making
Section 4 — Scaffolding Activities Reference
Phase
Activity
Purpose
Before Reading
Pre-teach key vocabulary with visuals
Removes word-level barriers before reading begins
Before Reading
Set a purpose for reading
Focuses attention and promotes active engagement
During Reading
Stop-and-jot annotation at key moments
Captures thinking in real time and models close reading
During Reading
Think-aloud modeling of inference
Makes an expert reader's reasoning process visible
After Reading
Small-group discussion connecting text to experience
Builds a bridge between the text and lived experience
After Reading
Student-teacher conference
Checks understanding and surfaces specific gaps
Section 5 — The 5-Task CRQ Map
Each task draws primarily on a specific exhibit. Knowing this in advance helps you plan which exhibit to reread for each paragraph.
1
Prior-knowledge connection — draws on Exhibit 1 (the excerpt's content and context)
2
Academic need — drawn primarily from Exhibit 2 (student response vs. success criteria)
3
Instructional strategy — should directly target the need surfaced in Exhibit 2, often refined using Exhibit 3
4
Assessment method — should measure progress on the same specific skill named in Task 2
5
Using the data — connects the assessment in Task 4 to a concrete next instructional decision
Section 6 — Key Terminology Quick Reference
Term
Definition / Application
Success criteria
The specific, student-facing description of what a strong response to an assignment looks like — compare a student's actual response against this to identify a need.
Learning objective
The specific skill or standard the lesson targets — always state your instructional strategy in terms of this, not a generic skill.
Text-dependent evidence
A specific quotation or detail from the excerpt or student response, used to support a claim about the student's need.
Formative assessment
An ongoing, informal check during instruction — often the most developmentally appropriate choice for Task 4.
Differentiation
Adjusting content, process, or product to meet varied student needs — can strengthen Task 3's instructional strategy.
Figurative language
Non-literal language (metaphor, simile, personification, symbolism) — a frequent focus of literary excerpts.
Rhetorical device
A deliberate technique (appeals, antithesis, parallelism) used in informational/argumentative excerpts to persuade.
Text structure
The organizational pattern of a text (cause/effect, compare/contrast, sequence) — relevant to informational excerpts.
Section 7 — Exhibit Analysis Guide
The ELAR 331 CRQ presents three exhibits. This guide shows what to analyze in each and the common mistakes that lower a score.
Exhibit
What to Analyze
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Exhibit 1: Learning Objective & Excerpt
The given TEKS objective and the excerpt's genre, craft elements, and content — what a strong response to this specific text/standard combination would require.
Ignoring the given standard and writing a generic response; misreading the excerpt's genre (treating informational text strategies as if the excerpt were literary, or vice versa).
Compare the student's actual written response line-by-line against the success criteria to identify precisely which criterion is unmet.
Naming a need not actually evidenced in the response; vague need descriptions ("needs to write better") instead of a specific skill.
Exhibit 3: Student-Teacher Discussion
Look for moments where the student reveals reasoning, confusion, or a near-miss insight that adds nuance to the need identified in Exhibit 2.
Ignoring the discussion transcript entirely; missing a detail the student almost grasped that a targeted strategy could unlock.
Critical reminders: Cite a pattern of evidence, not an isolated moment. Name the exact skill (not a vague label like "reading comprehension"). Ground your rationale in ELAR-specific pedagogy, not generic teaching principles. Reference all three exhibits somewhere in your response.
Practice Scenario: 10th-Grade Literary Excerpt
Use the information in the three exhibits below to complete the assignment. Analyze the information provided, citing specific evidence from the exhibits, and write a response of approximately 400–600 words in which you:
describe one strategy you would use to help the student connect prior knowledge and real-world experience to the new content and context in the excerpt provided;
describe one area of academic need the student demonstrates, related to an English language arts and/or reading skill or learning objective;
describe one developmentally appropriate instructional strategy to address the student's identified need, and explain why you would use that strategy;
describe one developmentally appropriate method of assessment to monitor the student's progress toward the identified skill or learning objective; and
explain how you would use data from this assessment method to measure the student's progress and plan future instruction.
Exhibit 1: Learning Objective and Excerpt
An English II teacher wants to help students develop the comprehension skill described in the TEKS for English Language Arts and Reading below.
TEKS ELA.10.6.G — Students are expected to analyze how an author's diction and use of figurative language contribute to the tone and mood of a literary text.
The teacher sets the daily learning objective below.
Students will be able to identify an example of figurative language in a text and explain how it contributes to the passage's mood.
The teacher assigns students to read the excerpt below from an original short story, "The Long Walk Home."
The porch light had burned out weeks ago, and no one had bothered to replace it. Maren stood at the end of the gravel drive, her sneakers soaked through, watching the dark windows of the house she used to call home. Somewhere behind that glass, her mother's voice used to fill every room like a held breath finally released — now the silence pressed against the walls instead, thick and patient, as if it had been waiting for her to leave so it could move in for good. She could still turn back. She could still knock. Instead, she counted the cracks in the driveway, memorizing them the way she used to memorize her mother's lullabies, and walked toward the road, letting the dark swallow the house whole behind her.
Exhibit 2: Student Assignment, Success Criteria, and Student Written Response
Students silently read the excerpt and then respond in writing to a prompt. The prompt and success criteria appear below.
Identify one example of figurative language in the excerpt and explain how it contributes to the passage's mood.
Success Criteria
In my written response, I will:
Identify one specific example of figurative language from the excerpt.
Explain how that device contributes to the passage's mood.
Support my explanation with a direct quotation from the text.
One student's response appears below.
"In the passage, the author writes that 'the silence pressed against the walls instead, thick and patient,' which is personification. This shows that the house is empty now. Maren left her house and doesn't want to go back inside. She counted the cracks in the driveway instead of knocking on the door. The mood of the passage is sad."
Exhibit 3: Student-Teacher Discussion
After responding to the assignment, the student has a one-on-one conversation with the teacher about the student's ability to explain how figurative language contributes to mood. A transcript of their conversation appears below.
Teacher: You identified personification in "the silence pressed against the walls." What human quality is the silence given here? Student: That it's like a person... waiting? Teacher: Right. And the passage says the silence was "patient" — like it had been waiting for her to leave. What does that suggest about how long this sadness has existed in the house? Student: I don't know. I guess... it was already sad before she left? Teacher: Exactly — so the personification isn't just describing an empty house. It's telling us the sadness was already there. How could you use that idea in your response? Student: I could say the house feels sad even before she's gone? Teacher: Good start. Now, why does that detail matter to the passage's overall mood? Student: I'm not sure how to explain that part.
0 words
Scoring Criteria
Completion — did you address all five tasks in the prompt? Application of Content — is your ELAR pedagogy knowledge accurate, and did you apply it correctly to this exact excerpt and standard? Support — did you cite specific evidence from all three exhibits (not just a general impression) and give well-reasoned explanations for why each strategy works?
Score Scale (4 down to 1)
4 — All five tasks are fully developed, your pedagogy is applied accurately and effectively to this exact excerpt and standard, and each part is backed by specific evidence from the exhibits and clear reasoning.
3 — Most or all tasks are addressed with generally sound pedagogy, but the response leans more general than exhibit-specific in places, or an explanation is thinner than it should be.
2 — Only some tasks are addressed, the strategy chosen only partially fits the actual need identified, and evidence or reasoning is limited or only loosely connected to the exhibits.
1 — Little of the prompt is addressed, the pedagogy applied is largely inaccurate or ineffective for this excerpt/standard, and there is little to no supporting evidence or explanation.
Sample Strong-Response Approach (Score Point 4 style)
Prior-knowledge connection: Before rereading the excerpt, I would have students journal about a time they left a familiar place and describe how the place "felt" as they left — building an experiential bridge to the passage's personification of the empty house before returning to craft analysis. Academic need: The student's response in Exhibit 2 correctly identifies personification and quotes the text, meeting two of the three success criteria, but never explains how the device shapes the passage's mood — it names the device and then summarizes plot events instead. The discussion in Exhibit 3 confirms this: with prompting, the student can restate what the personification implies, but says directly, "I'm not sure how to explain that part," when asked to connect it to mood. The specific need is explaining a figurative device's effect on mood, not identifying the device itself. Instructional strategy: A "device → literal meaning → effect on mood" three-column chart, modeled first with the "held breath finally released" simile, gives the student a concrete structure for moving from naming a device to analyzing its purpose — directly targeting the gap between identification and explanation revealed in Exhibit 3. Assessment method: A follow-up exit-ticket quick-write asking the student to complete the same three-column chart independently for a new short excerpt will reveal whether the student can now explain a device's effect without teacher prompting. Using the data: If the exit ticket shows the student can independently connect device to effect, I would move the student toward analyzing multiple devices working together in a single passage; if the gap persists, I would reteach with additional modeled examples before releasing the student to independent practice.
Common Lower-Score Mistakes
Naming a need not actually evidenced in the exhibits (e.g., claiming the student can't identify figurative language, when Exhibit 2 shows the student identified it correctly).
Describing the need vaguely ("needs to write better") instead of the specific skill: explaining a device's effect on mood.
Choosing an instructional strategy that doesn't logically target the exact need identified.
Ignoring Exhibit 3 entirely, missing the clearest evidence of where the student's understanding breaks down.
Skipping or under-developing one of the five required tasks.
📋
Curriculum Foundations: TEKS & ELPS
The state standards that ground every ELAR 331 constructed-response answer
The Domain IV constructed-response task explicitly requires you to explain why each instructional strategy works, grounded in the TEKS for ELAR. Knowing the strand structure — and where your English learners' ELPS proficiency level fits in — is what separates a generic answer from a strong one.
TEKS for ELAR — The 7 Strands
Every grade-level ELAR standard falls under one of these seven strands
1 · Foundational Language Skills
Listening, speaking, discussion, thinking, and vocabulary — developed and sustained across every grade
2 · Comprehension
Self-sustained reading and the strategies students use to construct meaning from text
3 · Response
Using text evidence to develop and support an interpretation in writing or discussion
4 · Multiple Genres
Recognizing and analyzing the characteristics of literary and informational genres
5 · Author's Purpose & Craft
Analyzing how authors choose language, structure, and technique to achieve a purpose
6 · Composition
The writing process, conventions, and genres of writing students produce
7 · Inquiry & Research
Asking questions, then gathering, evaluating, and synthesizing information from sources
ELPS — Current 4 Proficiency Levels
19 TAC §74.4 — in effect through the 2025–2026 school year
Beginning
Little or no English; relies heavily on visuals, gestures, and native-language support
Intermediate
Understands and uses simple English; needs support with academic language
Advanced
Understands and communicates in English with some errors; growing academic vocabulary
Advanced High
Communicates effectively in English, comparable to native-English-speaking peers, with occasional support
ELPS Update — Starting the 2026–2027 School Year
Adopted by the SBOE in September 2024 (19 TAC Ch. 120), effective February 2, 2025 — implementation begins 2026–2027
5 NEW PROFICIENCY LEVELS
Pre-Production
Beginning
Intermediate
High Intermediate
Advanced
2 NEW GRADE BANDS
Grades K–3
Grades 4–12
WHAT'S CHANGING
CURRENT (through 2025–2026)
4 proficiency levels · one framework for all grades
NEW (starting 2026–2027)
5 proficiency levels · separate K–3 and 4–12 grade bands · supported by TEA's new ELPS Guide (teksguide.org)
TEKS Guide Commentary — ELPS Cross-Curricular Second Language Acquisition
?
English language learners (ELLs) are expected to meet standards in a second language; however, their proficiency in English influences the ability to meet these standards. To demonstrate this knowledge throughout the stages of English language acquisition, comprehension of text requires additional scaffolds such as adapted text, translations, native language support, cognates, summaries, pictures, realia, glossaries, bilingual dictionaries, thesauri, and other modes of comprehensible input. ELLs can and should be encouraged to use knowledge of their first language to enhance vocabulary development; vocabulary needs to be in the context of connected discourse so that it is meaningful. Strategic use of the student's first language is important to ensure linguistic, affective, cognitive, and academic development in English.
Source: TEKS Guide (teksguide.org) — English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 3 · ELPS commentary
20 selected-response questions drawn from Domains I–III (Domain IV is practiced separately in the Constructed-Response tab)
Tap an answer to see immediate feedback and explanation
Your score and a domain breakdown appear at the end
Retake as many times as you like
Quiz Complete!
📚
ELAR 331 Vocabulary Bank
79 key terms across literary devices, rhetorical/argumentative devices, vocabulary, composition, and assessment
Choose how you'd like to study the vocabulary bank. Each mode pulls from all 79 terms.
Tap to flip →
Which definition matches this term?
NAVIGATOR
■ Current
■ Answered
■ Flagged
■ Unanswered
Multiple Choice Complete!
All Matched! 🎉
Completed in attempts
🎓
Simulated Exam
90 selected-response questions · Full-length · CAT format simulation
Exam Details
Questions: 90 SR (+ 1 CR practiced separately)
Time Allowed: 5 hours
Format: Computer-Adaptive
Passing: 240 (scale score, 100–300)
Domain Distribution (selected-response only):
🟢 Domain I (Reading Instruction and Assessment): 28 questions
🔵 Domain II (Text Comprehension and Analysis): 19 questions
🟣 Domain III (Oral and Written Communication): 28 questions
🟤 Domain IV (Educating All Learners and Professional Practice): 15 questions
🟠 Domain V (Constructed Response): scored via the separate constructed-response task, not included here
Test-Taking Tips:
Read every word — this exam rewards precision on "analyze" versus "identify" versus "evaluate."
Look for answer choices grounded in text-based evidence and the TEKS for ELAR.
Match the identified need or challenge to the specific strategy — don't pick a generically "good" strategy that targets the wrong skill.
Trust your first instinct unless you find a clear reason to change.